WARNING: INCEPTION IS A BIG, UNWIELDLY PIECE OF CRAP

Don’t see this movie.  It’s 148 minutes long and threatens to be enjoyable for about 12 of those minutes.  Don’t waste your time.

Ron Silliman, who tends to go ga-ga over dreck-poetry, loved this movie.   What is it about ’found poem’ LANGUAGE poetry, modernist, post-avants which makes them pee their pants over homages? 

Found Poem, Homage, Homage, Found Poem.     Gee, I wonder?

Here’s Ron:

“These levels of complexity are layered even further with homages – blatant ones – to a slew of other films. The fight sans gravity may remind you of The Matrix not because the antagonists are bouncing off the walls, but because Joseph Gordon-Levitt is wearing the same clothes as Hugo Weaving in that earlier movie (lacking only the mirror shades). Marion Cotillard, who won her Oscar for portraying Edith Piaf…” 

Thanks, Ron.

(By the way, did anyone see that Edith Piaf film? It was awful.)

Luther Blissett (writing on Silliman’s blog) nails it:

“Really? The movie I saw built up for nearly an hour what seemed like it was going to be a psychedelic dream sequence, full of non-Euclidian geometry and Borgesian labyrinths.

Instead, what we got was a pastiche of bad adventure movies — but without the wit of classic Bond or *Ocean’s Eleven*. Even the adventure sequences themselves played more like video games than imaginatively choreographed struggles.

Not a single character had the motivation to make me care about his or her journey. Ariadne seems instantly addicted to the infinite possibilities of dream architecture — except that the dreams fail to display any imagination. And even as she’s aware that DiCaptrio is a selfish sociopath, she tries to help him. Cobb’s journey lacks anything like the emotional weight of Odysseus’ nostos; he was a self-obsessed husband and father, and there’s no sign by the end that he’ll be any better. And the tycoon’s daddy issues are like a silly re-write of *Citizen Kane*. Never mind that these issues are manufactured by others — his father really *was* disappointed in him, and his future actions are simply brainwashed determinism.

I sort of admire the sheer audacity of pastiching this many films in one. It’s like *Fantastic Voyage* without any sense that the author understands neuroscience or cognitive psychology. It’s like *Superfly* or any other “last big score” film that tries to justify sociopathic behavior as a means to an end equation: I will kill you all just to get home.

All of which would have been all right if it was at all a visually stimulating movie. It’s about dreams, for crying out loud, and as Salon’s movie critic wrote, it seems as if Nolan’s dreams are scripted by Michael Bay.”

Yea, this is definitely not an ‘actor’s movie,’ and the story is predictable as hell.  

Don’t expect another Memento. 

As another reviewer (Telegraph, U.K.) put it:

“It’s like watching a Bond film in which you know that Bond’s life is never at risk. Actually make that two Bond films because Inception’s running time is an agonising 148 minutes. That’s 148 minutes in which nothing is ever at stake.”

19 Comments

  1. Donald Rumsfeld said,

    July 20, 2010 at 2:23 am

    Anonymous blogger bites God. Do not pass go. Do go to the movies and watch Inception, I’m sure Leo DiCaprio is a far finer entertaining entity than either Anonymous Film Critic or Ronald MacDonut Silly arse, both with as much poetic oomph as one another. Radical in the way watching Idol and Celebrity Nonentity’s subversive. A con.

    Give me DiCaprio’s highest opening film over these two losers, anyday. Oh, what, Inception might be as entertaining as Titanic and The Beach or Catch Me If You Can. Hmm, what should I do, watch the highest paid Hollywood actors on the planet do their magic, or aggregate Ron’s tweets as an act of poetic love?

    Get real.

  2. notevensuperficial said,

    July 20, 2010 at 5:25 am

    I want this movie to be a lot of fun – I’ll probably still see it, because I think Memento is so well-made and have a creepy – and creepily normal, I’m sure – middle-aged crush on Page. I hope all you haters are full of shit, but I have a strong feeling I’m going to get robbed of 10 skins and 2 1/2 hours.

    • thomasbrady said,

      July 20, 2010 at 11:41 am

      If you expect Memento, you’ll be sorely disappointed. I have a pretty strong feeling that Page’s pretty face will be the highlight of the film for you. Enjoy! There aint much else…lots and lots of mindless gun-play, lots of scenes of people with their eyes closed in a van…Marion Cotillard’s character is menacing, stupid, predictable, and pointless…yea, Page, that’s about it, but there’s not one good ‘role’ in the film…

  3. chuck.godwin said,

    July 20, 2010 at 7:03 pm

    The merits, or lack of merits, of the movie aside, it is the “Ron Silliman, who tends to go ga ga over dreck poetry” that is unbelievable. DRECK!! as in ‘trash’, ‘rubbish”. ?
    Granted, some of Mr. Silliman’s poetry and some of the poetry of some of the poets he goes “ga ga over” is difficult and unreadable and not poetic, in my view, but it is one thing to not enjoy, nor understand, a poet’s work and another to refer to it as rubbish. Even the great (or low, depending on your point of view) William Logan has not, in my readings, referred to a fellow poet’s writing as dreck. It’s a insult that is below your intelligence level, Brady. Raise the bar a bit.

  4. thomasbrady said,

    July 20, 2010 at 8:29 pm

    I dunno, Chuck, if something whose sole purpose is ‘to be read’ is found to be, in your words, ‘unreadable,’ then, by definition, what is it?

    I grant you that it may not be ‘trash’ to another, but to you, who finds it ‘unreadable,’ what is it?

    And further, what do you eventually do with it? Surely, very much sooner than later, you put it ‘in the trash.’ You may not call it ‘trash,’ but if you put it ‘in the trash,’ then what in God’s name is it? If we are honest, “trash” is surely what you deem it to be.

    Tom

    • chuck.godwin said,

      July 20, 2010 at 8:45 pm

      whatever, dude.
      I rest my case. The bar was not raised.

  5. thomasbrady said,

    July 20, 2010 at 10:00 pm

    what is ‘the bar?’ isn’t it truth?

    I’m a romantic idealist…if I don’t like it, it’s trash…it’s my philosophy, it’s not me!

  6. Fanz Bonkers said,

    July 20, 2010 at 11:48 pm

    Brady’s poetry is fucking useless shit. You piece of shit Brady. None of you fucking losers are gonna be read. Hell, you aint even fucking read now you cunts. You sons of cunts and writers of fucking dreck. Drop dead and die a very very fucking painful death you no good two-bit flanuer cunts.

  7. jeff said,

    September 9, 2010 at 4:47 am

    Hated the movie. There’s no definitive resolution. I think it’s purpose is to spark a debate? A better name for the move is Interpretation, not Inception. Nolan can go suck it.

  8. cornz said,

    November 18, 2010 at 8:10 pm

    I watched for 30 mins, then i watched another 30 mins in the hope it would pick up pace. It didn’t. Rubbish waste of time.

  9. DRKAN said,

    January 5, 2011 at 9:34 pm

    i was watching the first twenty minutes and i hate it. you could put a screen up angelina jolie’s ass to lure me into watching it again but i couldn’t care less.

  10. the dude man said,

    January 25, 2011 at 10:29 pm

    Fuck you Nolan you pretentious fucking hack. go to hell and stay there you stupid piece of monkey shit. Memento sucked, Prestige sucked, Batman Begins sucked, the Dark Knight is the worst cinematic abomination ever put to celluloid. Ledger sucks Nolan sucks everything Nolan touches sucks ass and i am glad you overrated ass got snubbed for best director. you dont deserve it and yu never ever eheheheheheeeeeeeeever will.

    • thomasbrady said,

      January 25, 2011 at 11:40 pm

      Hold on. Memento was pretty good.

  11. Noochness said,

    January 26, 2011 at 9:49 am

    I’m pulling for M. Night Shyamalan for “Worst Director”:

    http://razzies.com/history/2010-worst-director.asp

  12. Rachel said,

    January 28, 2011 at 2:14 am

    God, I completely agree. Inception is the shittiest time-waster you’ll ever regret putting yourself through. It seriously just tries to be complicated.

  13. thomasbrady said,

    January 28, 2011 at 2:51 am

    I’m having a dream in which people hate the movie Inception on a blog. A famous actor leaves a reply. I wake up. But I’m still dreaming. Now I’m the famous actor. Dreaming. Except it’s not a dream. It’s a movie. A really, really bad movie. I’m dreaming it’s a good movie. The people are leaving the dream in droves.

  14. Aaron Asphar said,

    January 28, 2011 at 10:02 am

    Thank you for helping me to understand the nature and features of the decline of robust, critical, dialectical thought in the twentieth century.
    http://wp.me/p1g8bc-gA

    • thomasbrady said,

      January 28, 2011 at 1:49 pm

      I see whence flows your scorn for Scarriet; your writing is so tortured, academic, foggy…

  15. nah said,

    April 30, 2011 at 3:43 am

    Inception sucked, and for those who thiks its a thinking mans movie, its far from it, maybe a dumb thinking mans movie.

    It was a pop culture film made to wow the people who bought into the promotions, and are easily amused by things they think they understand.

    Garbage, this movie was complete and absolute crap.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 34 other followers